Skip to main content

What do I want? Everything to change! When do I want it? Yesterday!



 

It has been said have very little patience, which is mostly accurate. I think I can be both extremely patient and massively impatient across different issues of different magnitudes at different times.

That said I like to think I have gained a more considered perspective in the last year or so, particularly in relation to the issue of organisational change. During that process, I have noticed a trend in some of my interactions with others. 

Change, and the demand for it, is being used as a weapon. ‘If things don’t change around here then I’ll be on my way’ and ‘things would never change, so I gave up and left' are statements I’ve heard.

Even in my variably patient/impatient state my recent experiences have taught me that change is an ebb and flow process. The rate of change can be easy and fluid, or hard and unyielding, but never, ever, linear.

This rate of change versus the amount of patience is never more prevalent than when an organisation is in the process of agile transformation. Across various organisational levels, from directors to developers, patience is a rare commodity.


I believe the source of this trend of impatience is the innate human inability to see the bigger picture over longer periods of time. We simply struggle to see beyond our immediate situation, and the pain of change is often underestimated.


For example I have consulted on agile transformations in recent years, where my own and others frustration with progress grew over time. However when I look back I realised that the organisation had come from a state of:

  • Multiple projects in progress for each team, most of which never finished.
  • Uneven team skill sets; some with no test, analysis or deployment focused individuals at all.
  • No test automation or continuous integration/delivery.
  • Long, drawn out projects, which sapped morale and encouraged attrition.

To, in a relatively short space of time:
  • Each team worked on one project until it was done.
  • Each team had a blended skill set.
  • Almost every team had continuous integration and delivery integrated into their processes.
  • Testing individuals had 3 or 4 tools in their locker for testing at DB, Service and UI levels, plus an appreciation of the subtler arts of exploratory and context driven testing.

There were still issues to be resolved, but I know which the more desirable state for a working environment is. 

In short, when it comes to change, I find that many cannot see the wood for the trees. Next time you get frustrated, remember where you began and try look at the bigger picture.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Lone Tester at a DevOps Conference

I recently had the chance to go to Velocity Conf in Amsterdam, which one might describe as a DevOps conference. I love going to conferences of all types, restricting the self to discipline specific events is counter intuitive to me, as each discipline involved in building and supporting something isn't isolated. Even if some organisations try and keep it that way, reality barges its way in. Gotta speak to each other some day.

So, I was in an awesome city, anticipating an enlightening few days. Velocity is big. I sometimes forget how big business some conferences are, most testing events I attend are usually in the hundreds of attendees. With big conferences comes the trappings of big business. For my part, I swapped product and testability ideas with Datadog, Pager Duty and others for swag. My going rate for consultancy appears to be tshirts, stickers and hats.

So, lets get to it:

3 Takeaways

Inclusiveness - there was a huge focus on effective teams, organisational dynamics and splitt…

Wheel of Testing Part 2 - Content

Thank you Reddit, while attempting to find pictures of the earths core, you surpass yourself.
Turns out Steve Buscemi is the centre of the world.

Anyway. Lets start with something I hold to be true. My testing career is mine to shape, it has many influences but only one driver. No one will do it for me. Organisations that offer a career (or even a vocation) are offering something that is not theirs to give. Too much of their own needs get in the way, plus morphing into a badass question-asker, assumption-challenger, claim-demolisher and illusion-breaker is a bit terrifying for most organisations. Therefore, I hope the wheel is a tool for possibilities not definitive answers, otherwise it would just be another tool trying to provide a path which is yours to define.


In part one, I discussed why I had thought about the wheel of testing in terms of my own motivations for creating it, plus applying the reasoning of a career in testing to it. As in, coming up with a sensible reflection of real…

Getting started with testability

At TestBash Netherlands, I said that, in my experience, a lot of testers don't really get testability. I would feel bad if I didn't follow that up with a starting point for expanding your mindset and explicitly thinking about testability day to day, and making your testing lives better! 

In large scale, high transaction systems testability really is critical, as compared to the vastness and variability of the world, testing done within organisations, before deployment, is limited by comparison. We need ways to see and learn from the systems we test where it matters, in Production.
Being able to observe, control and understand is central to testing effectively, and there are loads of resources and experience reports out there to help. I was/am inspired by James Bach, Seth Eliot, Matt Skelton, Sally Goble, Martin Fowler and a little bit of PerfBytes/Logchat, so lets see if it works for you! 

Overall Model:

Heuristics of Software Testability by James Bach

http://www.satisfice.com/tool…