Skip to main content

Skillz pay the, erm, billz

Apologies for the title.

Which are you (as a tester) most proud of? I'm going to make you choose.

Is it your domain knowledge, being the go to guy about this and that piece of functionality? Wow, your changing that are you? That caused problems last time. Oh and this is linked to that so if we change it, we'll need to be careful.


Is it your toolkit? Point me at anything and I can test it as I have the ability to craft a sensible context driven approach with the right tools for the situation.

As I've asked the question its only right I put my neck on the block first.

In my context, I'm most proud of my toolkit as in my line of work, domain knowledge is completely transient. I can be the king of the domain (and modest with it) one day, and pauper the next as I switch between industries.

But this is about much more than a set of tools and techniques, its about questioning fundamentals. Every new domain (to me) is the equivalent of a tour guide for an alien, with change blindness and functional fixedness barriers lessened allowing the appropriate approach and tools for the testing in hand emerge.

Build your toolkit. When the chips are down and you are in fix, they will serve you well. Encyclopedic knowledge of financial services when testing in an e-gaming context, not so much.


Popular posts from this blog

Testers Guide to Myths of Unit Testing

One area that testers might be able to enhance their contributions to software development teams is how we perceive and contribute to unit testing. I believe testers busting their own illusions about this aspect of building something good would bring us much closer to developers, and help us realise what other layers of testing can cover most effectively.

Also, I want to do a talk about it, so I figured I would test the premise, see if potential audiences were into it. I put this on Twitter:
Working on a talk about what testers might believe about unit #testing & how we interact with developers creating unit tests. Any challenges/additions for my list below? — Ash Winter (@northern_tester) December 19, 201730 replies with ideas tends to indicate that people might be into it. 
The ListI thought, as my final blog of 2017, I would provide a super useful list of the myths and legends we as testers might believe about unit testing:
That developer…

Wheel of Testing Part 3 - Applications

I've only had to quit two jobs to finally find the time to finish this blog series. Winning at life. If you need reminders (like I did) check out Part 1 and Part 2 before reading on...

After the first two blogs regarding the Wheel of Testing, I was delighted to receive a few requests for the wheel itself, which got me thinking about applications of it, beyond what its original intent was, which I've explored in detail in part 1 of this series of intermittent blogs. Most models need a little air time to show their value, in software development we crank out models all the time, but I'm not sure how many get used. I am inspired by models such as the "Heuristic Test Strategy Model" by James Marcus Bach, as I have used it and seen the benefits it has brought for my clients, particularly the ability to ask questions. So, I wanted to create a model which has a number of use cases, both real and imagined:

Helping to unlocking a career in testing which may be stuck

It is no…

The Team Test for Testability

You know what I see quite a lot. Really long-winded test maturity models. 

You know what I love to see? Really fast, meaningful ways to build a picture of your teams current state and provoke a conversation about improvement. The excellent test improvement card game by Huib Schoots and Joep Schuurkes is a great example. I also really like 'The Joel Test' by Joel Spolsky, a number of questions you can answer yes or no to to gain insight into their effectiveness as a software development team.

I thought something like this for testability might an interesting experiment, so here goes:

If you ask the team to change their codebase do they react positively?Does each member of the team have access to the system source control?Does the team know which parts of the codebase are subject to the most change?Does the team collaborate regularly with teams that maintain their dependencies?Does the team have regular contact with the users of the system?Can you set your system into a given state…