Skip to main content

Certified Scrum Product Owner - Mission, Principles and Approach


I’ll be embarking on the ‘Certified Scrum Product Owner’ course tomorrow. Ye gods I hear you cry, ‘You’re going to be certified (or certifiable)!’ and ‘It’s methodology specific, what about context, won’t somebody please think of the context?’ 

Before we all get bent (!) out of shape, hear me out. For a great many activities I undertake I define a mission (my statement of intent), principles (thoughts that may guide me) and an approach (how I will behave, act and actions I’ll take).


My Mission
‘In my recent experience, a lack of focus on return on investment has led to a number of unsuccessful product outcomes and identified a gap in my knowledge. Testing is rooted in return on investment (time, effort, thought) and more empathy with a Product Owner and the decisions made can help focus testing on what’s really important.’
My Principles

  • The course I am about to embark on is theory. Theory is a good grounding but context remains as the focus. I remind myself, ‘there are no best practices only good practices in context.’
  • The skills I learn will be added to my overall toolkit, for me, the certification is arbitrary but welcome. The expansion of the tools I have is the aim.
  • Quality can be defined as value to ‘some person.’ That ‘some person’ may have a stake in the Product. I’ll bear this in mind when discussing quality on the course.
  • Testing and return on investment are interdependent. Development on a product can be subject to a similar law of diminishing returns as the amount of testing executed is.
  • Acknowledge the bias I bring to the course. I approach the course as a tester, which influences my focus and aims.
My Approach

  • Make my mission available to all participants, accept challenges and critically assess that mission on a continuous basis.
  • Listen (yes, I do need to remind myself to do this)
  • Learn, engage with the new, and contrast that with your current world view.
  • Identify where the knowledge is of use to you in the ‘real world.’ Plan to apply that. 

So, those are my thoughts, I sincerely hope that what I learn will dramatically change these ideas. I will create a review blog and let you know how I got on!



Comments

  1. The product owner is someone who has an in-depth knowledge about business needs for the product being delivered. The product owner has to be an individual as the decision making power cannot be given to a team. If there is a team of stakeholders that helps the product owner, the final decision making power should lie with the product owner .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Casey

      I agree up to a point but the relationship between Product Owner and Team must have an element of give and take. Keeping the team engaged and focused on value (and not dictated to) is also part of the role for my money.

      As a Product Owner, I want teams to make some decisions. If you are doing your job, your team feel empathy with the business too, enabling them to make certain decisions with a nod in your direction so you can input if you need to.

      Large, paradigm shifts should be the reserve of the Product Owner as decision maker (as a heuristic). When in that role, I tend to sweat the small stuff on a periodic basis and do a deep dive on a story.

      Maybe thats just my style.

      Thanks

      Ash

      Delete
  2. Scrum has become one of the most popular Agile methodologies used for software and product development. Various factors have contributed to this popularity. The methodology works very well with complex projects where requirements change often and/or the technology is new and not used before.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Wheel of Testing Part 2 - Content

Thank you Reddit, while attempting to find pictures of the earths core, you surpass yourself.
Turns out Steve Buscemi is the centre of the world.

Anyway. Lets start with something I hold to be true. My testing career is mine to shape, it has many influences but only one driver. No one will do it for me. Organisations that offer a career (or even a vocation) are offering something that is not theirs to give. Too much of their own needs get in the way, plus morphing into a badass question-asker, assumption-challenger, claim-demolisher and illusion-breaker is a bit terrifying for most organisations. Therefore, I hope the wheel is a tool for possibilities not definitive answers, otherwise it would just be another tool trying to provide a path which is yours to define.


In part one, I discussed why I had thought about the wheel of testing in terms of my own motivations for creating it, plus applying the reasoning of a career in testing to it. As in, coming up with a sensible reflection of real…

Getting started with testability

At TestBash Netherlands, I said that, in my experience, a lot of testers don't really get testability. I would feel bad if I didn't follow that up with a starting point for expanding your mindset and explicitly thinking about testability day to day, and making your testing lives better! 

In large scale, high transaction systems testability really is critical, as compared to the vastness and variability of the world, testing done within organisations, before deployment, is limited by comparison. We need ways to see and learn from the systems we test where it matters, in Production.
Being able to observe, control and understand is central to testing effectively, and there are loads of resources and experience reports out there to help. I was/am inspired by James Bach, Seth Eliot, Matt Skelton, Sally Goble, Martin Fowler and a little bit of PerfBytes/Logchat, so lets see if it works for you! 

Overall Model:

Heuristics of Software Testability by James Bach

http://www.satisfice.com/tool…

The Team Test for Testability

You know what I see quite a lot. Really long-winded test maturity models. 

You know what I love to see? Really fast, meaningful ways to build a picture of your teams current state and provoke a conversation about improvement. The excellent test improvement card game by Huib Schoots and Joep Schuurkes is a great example. I also really like 'The Joel Test' by Joel Spolsky, a number of questions you can answer yes or no to to gain insight into their effectiveness as a software development team.

I thought something like this for testability might an interesting experiment, so here goes:

If you ask the team to change their codebase do they react positively?Does each member of the team have access to the system source control?Does the team know which parts of the codebase are subject to the most change?Does the team collaborate regularly with teams that maintain their dependencies?Does the team have regular contact with the users of the system?Can you set your system into a given state…