Skip to main content

Sometimes you know how but you can't say how.....


I was once asked to create a ‘Sprint Diary’ for how to be an ‘agile tester.’ That’s right, on the first day do this, on day two say this, on day three create that. Now, I can understand why they (vagueness to protect the guilty/innocent) wanted this ‘guide.’ I meet many testers who feel discomfort in the agile world who want to know which way to turn. 

They didn’t like my answer. I said:



‘I might be able to show you but I can’t tell you.’

Why ever not they said. I said:



‘The skill and understanding is in the moment, when decisions are made.’

When is this moment they asked. I replied:



‘To be honest I don’t know. And I might not know at the time.’

Honesty does cause a great deal of consternation. Much grumbling ensued.


So after pondering on this exchange, my reflections led me to these (personal) principles:


  • Strive for optionality. In a world where factors that cannot be finalised or nailed down are constantly hounded for a state they are incapable of, be the person who retains their options. Leave doors open for people, systems, tools and techniques. Who knows when you might need an extra option in a squeeze?
  • My old buddy context. Often neglected, but always waiting to be found. Ask just the right question, dig a little deeper, and ask someone you might not usually ask. When someone on the team asks ‘what is the context of this issue?’ it always brings a little smile to my face, as it usually leads to an epiphany.
  • Timing is crucial. You always hear phrases like ‘just enough, just in time’ and ‘last responsible moment’ in agile discourse. Can you honestly think of a teaching strategy to find the ‘last responsible moment’ to make a decision? It is ethereal, one moment you can taste it, the next it’s gone. And there’s a very good chance you’ll get it wrong. A lot.

I’ve been on agile training courses but I have never proceeded thinking that it would teach me to be ‘more agile.’ To approach without recognising the fallibility of such endeavours is understating the importance of the tacit knowledge required.
 

Of the three principles above how many do you think can be taught and to what extent? I don’t have the right answer. As an industry we chase tacit knowledge tirelessly, trying to encapsulate in training courses and the like, I chose to go back to (my) first principles.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Lone Tester at a DevOps Conference

I recently had the chance to go to Velocity Conf in Amsterdam, which one might describe as a DevOps conference. I love going to conferences of all types, restricting the self to discipline specific events is counter intuitive to me, as each discipline involved in building and supporting something isn't isolated. Even if some organisations try and keep it that way, reality barges its way in. Gotta speak to each other some day.

So, I was in an awesome city, anticipating an enlightening few days. Velocity is big. I sometimes forget how big business some conferences are, most testing events I attend are usually in the hundreds of attendees. With big conferences comes the trappings of big business. For my part, I swapped product and testability ideas with Datadog, Pager Duty and others for swag. My going rate for consultancy appears to be tshirts, stickers and hats.

So, lets get to it:

3 Takeaways

Inclusiveness - there was a huge focus on effective teams, organisational dynamics and splitt…

Wheel of Testing Part 2 - Content

Thank you Reddit, while attempting to find pictures of the earths core, you surpass yourself.
Turns out Steve Buscemi is the centre of the world.

Anyway. Lets start with something I hold to be true. My testing career is mine to shape, it has many influences but only one driver. No one will do it for me. Organisations that offer a career (or even a vocation) are offering something that is not theirs to give. Too much of their own needs get in the way, plus morphing into a badass question-asker, assumption-challenger, claim-demolisher and illusion-breaker is a bit terrifying for most organisations. Therefore, I hope the wheel is a tool for possibilities not definitive answers, otherwise it would just be another tool trying to provide a path which is yours to define.


In part one, I discussed why I had thought about the wheel of testing in terms of my own motivations for creating it, plus applying the reasoning of a career in testing to it. As in, coming up with a sensible reflection of real…

Getting started with testability

At TestBash Netherlands, I said that, in my experience, a lot of testers don't really get testability. I would feel bad if I didn't follow that up with a starting point for expanding your mindset and explicitly thinking about testability day to day, and making your testing lives better! 

In large scale, high transaction systems testability really is critical, as compared to the vastness and variability of the world, testing done within organisations, before deployment, is limited by comparison. We need ways to see and learn from the systems we test where it matters, in Production.
Being able to observe, control and understand is central to testing effectively, and there are loads of resources and experience reports out there to help. I was/am inspired by James Bach, Seth Eliot, Matt Skelton, Sally Goble, Martin Fowler and a little bit of PerfBytes/Logchat, so lets see if it works for you! 

Overall Model:

Heuristics of Software Testability by James Bach

http://www.satisfice.com/tool…