Skip to main content

Helping


I’m currently experiencing something I never thought I would.

The technology team I work in isn’t the slightly odd, dysfunctional part of the business, tucked away in the corner, showing signs of madness, gibbering binary nonsense at anyone who strays within range. I believe we are a high functioning team and have gone further, we are reaching out and contributing to improving the wider organisational system. I know, I have fallen off my chair several times.

How are we achieving this state I hear you ask? I won’t provide an illusion of perfection but I think we are doing these things really well:
  • Saying yes, because technology is the art of the possible. Genuinely living the ethos that we can build what you need, share your priorities, help us understand, then we’ll get to it. Go to point 2.
  • Releasing stuff regularly to get feedback. I know this is old hat, but you’d be amazed what it can achieve. Roughly weekly, mostly when it’s valuable, not overloading. Asking if you want more stuff, not here’s more stuff.
  • Helping to determine what the organisation considers valuable over falling down the rabbit hole of what we can provide. The perennial conversation that we’ve all been involved with, I’ll tell you what I want, when you tell me what you can give me. Which usually results in the wrong solution to a poorly understood problem.
  • Providing coaching on the implications of technology. As in technology and what it means for the business proposition, not just how technology has been implemented. Where is it strong or weak? What choices did we make? 
  • Espousing the value of team. That every team should have everything it needs in order to succeed. If the team needs these skills, then let’s make that happen. Also, not just filling gaps. For example, not just hiring testers, but encouraging testers to encourage others to take responsibility in appropriate ways. If you hire more testers, you’ll more than likely get more testing, but less likely a great deal more value.
  • Genuinely hiring for behaviours. I’ve played at this before, but that urge to think ‘commercially’ has meant rushed decisions with months of pain. Making the hiring process equitable (you have to be happy with us, not just us happy with you) is much more pragmatic than the misery for both parties of being a square peg in a round hole.
  • Asking for clarity on the mission. Usually the technology teams are the last to know and/or understand the mission of the organisation. Not us. Rather than trying to hide on the periphery, we are front and centre of the mission, discussing how technology can enable us to realise that mission.
I personally love being a part of all this. I hope we can create an organisation which genuinely lives its values. Something I’ve been seeking for a long time.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Testers Guide to Myths of Unit Testing

One area that testers might be able to enhance their contributions to software development teams is how we perceive and contribute to unit testing. I believe testers busting their own illusions about this aspect of building something good would bring us much closer to developers, and help us realise what other layers of testing can cover most effectively.

Also, I want to do a talk about it, so I figured I would test the premise, see if potential audiences were into it. I put this on Twitter:
Working on a talk about what testers might believe about unit #testing & how we interact with developers creating unit tests. Any challenges/additions for my list below? #development#agilepic.twitter.com/4oT5HE4qs3 — Ash Winter (@northern_tester) December 19, 201730 replies with ideas tends to indicate that people might be into it. 
The ListI thought, as my final blog of 2017, I would provide a super useful list of the myths and legends we as testers might believe about unit testing:
That developer…

Wheel of Testing Part 2 - Content

Thank you Reddit, while attempting to find pictures of the earths core, you surpass yourself.
Turns out Steve Buscemi is the centre of the world.

Anyway. Lets start with something I hold to be true. My testing career is mine to shape, it has many influences but only one driver. No one will do it for me. Organisations that offer a career (or even a vocation) are offering something that is not theirs to give. Too much of their own needs get in the way, plus morphing into a badass question-asker, assumption-challenger, claim-demolisher and illusion-breaker is a bit terrifying for most organisations. Therefore, I hope the wheel is a tool for possibilities not definitive answers, otherwise it would just be another tool trying to provide a path which is yours to define.


In part one, I discussed why I had thought about the wheel of testing in terms of my own motivations for creating it, plus applying the reasoning of a career in testing to it. As in, coming up with a sensible reflection of real…

Wheel of Testing Part 3 - Applications

I've only had to quit two jobs to finally find the time to finish this blog series. Winning at life. If you need reminders (like I did) check out Part 1 and Part 2 before reading on...

After the first two blogs regarding the Wheel of Testing, I was delighted to receive a few requests for the wheel itself, which got me thinking about applications of it, beyond what its original intent was, which I've explored in detail in part 1 of this series of intermittent blogs. Most models need a little air time to show their value, in software development we crank out models all the time, but I'm not sure how many get used. I am inspired by models such as the "Heuristic Test Strategy Model" by James Marcus Bach, as I have used it and seen the benefits it has brought for my clients, particularly the ability to ask questions. So, I wanted to create a model which has a number of use cases, both real and imagined:

Helping to unlocking a career in testing which may be stuck

It is no…