Skip to main content

Skillz pay the, erm, billz

Apologies for the title.

Which are you (as a tester) most proud of? I'm going to make you choose.



Is it your domain knowledge, being the go to guy about this and that piece of functionality? Wow, your changing that are you? That caused problems last time. Oh and this is linked to that so if we change it, we'll need to be careful.

OR


Is it your toolkit? Point me at anything and I can test it as I have the ability to craft a sensible context driven approach with the right tools for the situation.







As I've asked the question its only right I put my neck on the block first.

In my context, I'm most proud of my toolkit as in my line of work, domain knowledge is completely transient. I can be the king of the domain (and modest with it) one day, and pauper the next as I switch between industries.

But this is about much more than a set of tools and techniques, its about questioning fundamentals. Every new domain (to me) is the equivalent of a tour guide for an alien, with change blindness and functional fixedness barriers lessened allowing the appropriate approach and tools for the testing in hand emerge.

Build your toolkit. When the chips are down and you are in fix, they will serve you well. Encyclopedic knowledge of financial services when testing in an e-gaming context, not so much.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Lone Tester at a DevOps Conference

I recently had the chance to go to Velocity Conf in Amsterdam, which one might describe as a DevOps conference. I love going to conferences of all types, restricting the self to discipline specific events is counter intuitive to me, as each discipline involved in building and supporting something isn't isolated. Even if some organisations try and keep it that way, reality barges its way in. Gotta speak to each other some day.

So, I was in an awesome city, anticipating an enlightening few days. Velocity is big. I sometimes forget how big business some conferences are, most testing events I attend are usually in the hundreds of attendees. With big conferences comes the trappings of big business. For my part, I swapped product and testability ideas with Datadog, Pager Duty and others for swag. My going rate for consultancy appears to be tshirts, stickers and hats.

So, lets get to it:

3 Takeaways

Inclusiveness - there was a huge focus on effective teams, organisational dynamics and splitt…

Wheel of Testing Part 2 - Content

Thank you Reddit, while attempting to find pictures of the earths core, you surpass yourself.
Turns out Steve Buscemi is the centre of the world.

Anyway. Lets start with something I hold to be true. My testing career is mine to shape, it has many influences but only one driver. No one will do it for me. Organisations that offer a career (or even a vocation) are offering something that is not theirs to give. Too much of their own needs get in the way, plus morphing into a badass question-asker, assumption-challenger, claim-demolisher and illusion-breaker is a bit terrifying for most organisations. Therefore, I hope the wheel is a tool for possibilities not definitive answers, otherwise it would just be another tool trying to provide a path which is yours to define.


In part one, I discussed why I had thought about the wheel of testing in terms of my own motivations for creating it, plus applying the reasoning of a career in testing to it. As in, coming up with a sensible reflection of real…

What if information isn't enough?

One of my aims for this year has been to attend/talk at what I will class for the purposes of this blog as 'non-testing' events, primarily to speak about what on earth testing is and how we can lampoon the myths and legends around it. It gets some really interesting reactions from professionals within other disciplines.

And usually those reactions (much like this particular blog), leave me with more questions than answers!

Huh?

After speaking at a recent event, I was asked an interesting question by an attendee. This guy was great, he reinvented himself every few years into a new part of technology, his current focus, machine learning. His previous life, 'Big Data', more on that later. Anyway, he said (something like):

'I enjoyed your talk but I think testing as an information provider doesn't go far enough. If they aren't actionable insights, then what's the point?'
This is why I like 'non-testing' events, someone challenging a tenet than has be…