Skip to main content

"This project is different as it has no functional changes"

I've heard this statement a few times.

"There are no functional changes to the system, just a bunch of non functional updates to hardware and software."

Huh?

What I really hear is:

"We are changing broad areas of the system, but we're not adding any buttons/fields/pages/widgets so we're going to classify this as a non functional project."

This sort of assumption needs to be challenged. If you are changing the foundation of a system, there cannot not be any functional changes! The reaction and interaction of a systems users dictates function. For clarity a user can be a human or another system in this context.

Do the following count as 'change?'
  • System changes speed: If the system responds slower or faster, those using it will respond to that. Improving your performance can have negative impacts on the consumers of your system, if the user expects a certain speed of response.
  • Systems inherent fragility changes:  If the system has more or less availability this will change interaction. Expectations will rise (or fall), so might volume!
So, next time someone says "there's no functional change", as a tester remember that there is more to a system than the functionality it contains, its behaviour has a profound effect on its stakeholders. 

Remember, if you convert your teapot to be made from chocolate, its function is the same but it's behaviour is pretty different!



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Lone Tester at a DevOps Conference

I recently had the chance to go to Velocity Conf in Amsterdam, which one might describe as a DevOps conference. I love going to conferences of all types, restricting the self to discipline specific events is counter intuitive to me, as each discipline involved in building and supporting something isn't isolated. Even if some organisations try and keep it that way, reality barges its way in. Gotta speak to each other some day.

So, I was in an awesome city, anticipating an enlightening few days. Velocity is big. I sometimes forget how big business some conferences are, most testing events I attend are usually in the hundreds of attendees. With big conferences comes the trappings of big business. For my part, I swapped product and testability ideas with Datadog, Pager Duty and others for swag. My going rate for consultancy appears to be tshirts, stickers and hats.

So, lets get to it:

3 Takeaways

Inclusiveness - there was a huge focus on effective teams, organisational dynamics and splitt…

Wheel of Testing Part 2 - Content

Thank you Reddit, while attempting to find pictures of the earths core, you surpass yourself.
Turns out Steve Buscemi is the centre of the world.

Anyway. Lets start with something I hold to be true. My testing career is mine to shape, it has many influences but only one driver. No one will do it for me. Organisations that offer a career (or even a vocation) are offering something that is not theirs to give. Too much of their own needs get in the way, plus morphing into a badass question-asker, assumption-challenger, claim-demolisher and illusion-breaker is a bit terrifying for most organisations. Therefore, I hope the wheel is a tool for possibilities not definitive answers, otherwise it would just be another tool trying to provide a path which is yours to define.


In part one, I discussed why I had thought about the wheel of testing in terms of my own motivations for creating it, plus applying the reasoning of a career in testing to it. As in, coming up with a sensible reflection of real…

What if information isn't enough?

One of my aims for this year has been to attend/talk at what I will class for the purposes of this blog as 'non-testing' events, primarily to speak about what on earth testing is and how we can lampoon the myths and legends around it. It gets some really interesting reactions from professionals within other disciplines.

And usually those reactions (much like this particular blog), leave me with more questions than answers!

Huh?

After speaking at a recent event, I was asked an interesting question by an attendee. This guy was great, he reinvented himself every few years into a new part of technology, his current focus, machine learning. His previous life, 'Big Data', more on that later. Anyway, he said (something like):

'I enjoyed your talk but I think testing as an information provider doesn't go far enough. If they aren't actionable insights, then what's the point?'
This is why I like 'non-testing' events, someone challenging a tenet than has be…